Thoughts: The Alchemyst by Michael Scott


The Alchemyst by Michael Scott
Final Verdict: 2.75 out of 4.0
YTD: 4

The Alchemyst by Michael Scott is book one in “The Secrets of The Immortal Nicholas Flamel,” a YA fantasy series often likened to Harry Potter. Sophie and Josh Newman, teenagers and twins, have spent most of their lives moving from place to place. Their parents are architects who are always on the move, searching for that next big find. Because of this, the twins have become used to instability and are rather adept at adapting. This is fortunate because, one day, the strange bookshop owner who Josh works for, Nick Fleming, is attacked by a powerful and legendary magician, Dr. John Dee, and his golem minions. Immediately, Josh and Sophie are swept off by Fleming, torn from their family and told that they might just be the two people who will become responsible for saving the world, as the prophecies say. The twins are thrust into an underworld filled with ancient legends, dark and powerful gods, bitter rivalries, and the many varied forms of magic, alchemy, sorcery, and science – and, soon, their own powers are to be awakened.

While many people have told me that this is their second favorite fantasy series, after Harry Potter, I am not quite as convinced or enthralled. I do plan to read the next book in the series, and hopefully finish the entire thing at some point.  However, one of the weakest elements for The Alchemyst was, in my opinion, its characters – and characters/characterization is always an important story element for me. The main characters, Sophie and Josh, are thrown into the major plot so quickly; there is little time to learn anything about them. Then, as things continue to happen, we do see certain elements of their personalities (mostly told, not shown), such as Josh’s potential jealousies, Sophie’s insecurities, and the fact that they have learned to love & protect each other as a result of not just being siblings, but also having absent parents who move around so much. Still, there was so little depth to them, and even less to the secondary characters. Nicholas Flamel’s love-story with Penelope is interesting, but not entirely relevant. I wish the pace of the story would have slowed down so that the characters could have had more time to interact and so that the narrative itself could have told us more about them, their histories, and their motivations. Maybe this will happen in later books – but as a stand-alone examination of this first book, I must say I was disappointed.

That being said, the book is largely an action-fantasy or fantasy-adventure story, and the prose and structure are certainly fitting. The language and vocabulary are appropriate for the reading level, and the pages definitely turn (which is both a pro and a con, in this case). In addition to a strong style, there are many historical and mythological elements of the book which are interesting and educational, something I enjoy quite a bit in fantasy stories of this level (the reason why I love the Rick Riordan books so much – they are fun and they teach us things). I particularly enjoy the exploration of “auras” as a type of power and individuality.  Still, I felt that much of the time, Scott was throwing his mythological characters into the story for the sake of having them and to show off just how much he had researched about these ancient tales. The gods (Elders) pop-up all over the place, as do the immortals, mythological beasts, etc. There is a whole lot happening all of the time, which is fine for keeping one occupied, but upon reflection, I realize it left me with a sense of time spent pleasantly, simply, but unsatisfactorily. This first book, I felt, was interesting and fun. It has some great historical/mythological foundations to pull from, and the Author’s Note at the end of the book, which tells of Scott’s research into Flamel, is fantastic. But, ultimately, it was a bit of a shallow reading experience. If you are looking for a fun fantasy tale that won’t necessarily leave you thinking about it afterwards, this might be a good book for you.

Suggested Reading for:
Age Level: MG/YA
Interest: Fantasy, Mythology, Alchemy, Siblings, Twins, Family, Absent Parents

Notable Quotes:

“[Humans] barely look, they rarely listen, they never smell, and they think they can only experience feelings through their skin. But they talk, oh, do they talk. That makes up for the lack of use of their other senses.” (149-50)

“Once begun, change cannot be reversed.” (225)

11 Comments on “Thoughts: The Alchemyst by Michael Scott

  1. Ooo poo Adam! I wanted you to love this one 😦
    Oh well, hopefully you’ll warm up to them as you read more if the series, maybe. Enjoyed your review though, and I understand your points about characterization.


    • I know – it was tough to write because so many people love this book/series and many were excited when I started to read it. But, I didn’t hate it and I do plan to read the next books, so it’s not all bad. There were things I enjoyed about it. 🙂


  2. I’ve actually tried getting through this book several times and I’ve always put it down. I just can’t get through it. I definitely agree that mythological characters are just thrown in there willy nilly. I don’t think they always work either. And I don’t like the villain. WAY better mythological books are by Rick Riordan. You’ve probably read the Percy Jackson series. SO much better.


  3. I quite agree with you on this book, after the third book I lost the main plot ’cause so many detail left behind or unanswers. The good things on this series is the historical part, about the fantasy stories I prefer Septimus Sage series by Angie Sage or try Charlie Bone by Jenny Nimmo, it’s more likely Harry Potter’s plot for me. I’m fantasy mania, so for me the good fantasy stories is like Neil Gaiman, Phillip Pullman and of course the legendary Harry Potter.


  4. Hmm, Harry Potter? Big shoes to fill. I’l wait for your review of the next book before going onboard with this one. 🙂


  5. I never got past the first chapter of this book. It was hard for me to get past the wrong info the author gave about San Francisco and the university. UCSF does not have an Archeology dept. and SF in Summer is cold and foggy. A little research would have kept me reading.


    • I have the next one (The Magician) on my shelf – I’ll read that one before deciding whether or not to finish the series. I have a hard time starting but not finishing series’ but, that being said, I read the first book in 3 series’ (The Dark is Rising, His Dark Materials, and So You Want to be a Wizard) last year, and I’m also on track with two Riordan series (Heroes of Olympus & Kane Chronicles), and also the the Book of Beginnings series by John Stephens (I’ve read The Emerald Atlas & I own book 2, The Fire Chronicle) AND I’ve read the first couple of Chronicles of Narnia but haven’t finished the rest. Now, I just started the Dark Tower series by Stephen King, which is a 7-book series. So, I’m really into WAY too many series… or maybe people are just writing too many series these days? Anyhow, I need to finish all the ones I’ve started, seriously. I feel so unaccomplished when I read the first book or two and then never finish – it’s different when I’m on pace with a series (like Heroes of Olympus), but some of these series’ have been published in full for ages and yet I’m just beginning or I’ve let so much time pass… gah.


  6. I’ve read most of this series and while, of course, it’s no Harry Potter it did pull me in. I agree that the twins are a bit flat and sometimes the story twists with no explanation. Keep reading and see what you think.


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: